tabu_search
Tabu search is a metaheuristic that guides a local-search procedure by using a short-term memory structure (the tabu list) to avoid revisiting recently explored solutions and to escape local minima. It is particularly useful for combinatorial optimization problems such as the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), graph coloring, and scheduling.
At each iteration, a set of candidate neighbors is examined and the best admissible neighbor (non-tabu or allowed by aspiration) is selected.
The library provides the parametric object
tabu_search(Problem, RandomAlgorithm) where Problem is an object
implementing the tabu_search_problem_protocol protocol and
RandomAlgorithm is one of the algorithms supported by the
fast_random library. The algorithm minimizes the energy (cost)
function defined by the problem.
A convenience object tabu_search(Problem) is also provided, using
the Xoshiro128++ random number generator (xoshiro128pp) as the
default.
API documentation
Open the ../../apis/library_index.html#tabu-search link in a web browser.
Loading
To load this library, load its loader.lgt file:
| ?- logtalk_load(tabu_search(loader)).
Testing
To test this library, load its tester.lgt file:
| ?- logtalk_load(tabu_search(tester)).
Features
Configurable random number generator - the algorithm is parameterized by a
fast_randomalgorithm. Available algorithms includexoshiro128pp,xoshiro128ss,xoshiro256pp,xoshiro256ss,well512a,splitmix64, andas183. The convenience objecttabu_search(Problem)defaults toxoshiro128pp.Tabu list (short-term memory) - recently visited states or their
tabu_key/2keys are stored with an expiration step. A state left by a move is forbidden during the nextTcandidate-selection steps. With fixed tenure (tabu_tenure(T)) the list behaves as a FIFO of maximum lengthT. Withtabu_tenure_range(Min, Max)each accepted move receives a random tenure drawn uniformly from the inclusive range. A problem-definedtabu_tenure/4schedule takes precedence over both options. Candidates whose keys appear in the active list are forbidden unless the aspiration criterion is met.Aspiration criterion - a tabu candidate is accepted when its energy is strictly better than the best energy found so far (classic “best-so-far” aspiration), unless the problem supplies its own
aspiration/3policy.Candidate sampling - by default the algorithm samples
candidates(N)neighbors per iteration usingneighbor_state/2(orneighbor_state/3). If the problem definesneighbors/2, that complete list is used in its original order when it fits the candidate limit. Otherwise, a uniform subset is selected without replacement by position and shuffled using the configured random number generator.Exhaustive evaluation -
exhaustive(true)evaluates the entireneighbors/2list in source order, regardless ofcandidates(N), without subset sampling. Enumeration must be implemented and succeed for every visited state; an empty list is valid.Delta-energy optimization - when the problem object defines
neighbor_state/3, the algorithm uses the returned energy delta directly instead of callingstate_energy/2on the neighbor. This is useful when computing the energy change is cheaper than recomputing the full energy.Best state tracking - the algorithm tracks the best state found across all iterations and across all restart cycles, not just the final state.
Progress reporting - if the problem object defines
progress/5, it is called periodically with completed global steps, best and current energies, and acceptance and improvement rates since the preceding report. Theupdates(N)option controls the reporting interval. When enabled, each cycle produces a final report instead of any coincident periodic report. A zero-step interval has zero rates.Run statistics - the
run/4predicate returns a list of statistics including the number of steps, acceptances, improvements, and the final tabu-list size.Seed control - the
seed(S)option initializes the random number generator for reproducible runs. A problem using an independent generator must also seed that generator; the option only controls the configuredfast_randomalgorithm.Restarts - the
restarts(N)option runs N additional tabu-search cycles after the first, with a cleared tabu list. The problem can supply a diversified state usingrestart_state/2; otherwise each restart begins from the global best. Statistics accumulate across all cycles.
Defining a problem
A problem object implements the tabu_search_problem_protocol
protocol and defines the following predicates, plus at least one
neighborhood predicate:
initial_state(-State)- returns the starting state.state_energy(+State, -Energy)- computes the cost of a state (to be minimized).
Optionally, the problem object may also define:
neighbor_state(+State, -Neighbor)- generates a neighboring state.neighbor_state(+State, -Neighbor, -DeltaEnergy)- generates a neighboring state and returns the energy change directly, avoiding a full energy recomputation.neighbors(+State, -Neighbors)- returns the complete list of neighboring states. When defined, the algorithm uses this list (or a random sample controlled bycandidates(N)) instead of repeated neighbor generation. Theexhaustive(true)option evaluates the entire list.stop_condition(+Step, +BestEnergy, +CurrentEnergy)- succeeds when the search should terminate early.progress(+Step, +BestEnergy, +CurrentEnergy, +AcceptanceRate, +ImprovementRate)called periodically during the optimization to report progress.
tabu_key(+State, -Key)- returns a compact or canonical tabu-equivalence key. Without this hook, the state itself is used. Keys are compared using==/2, without instantiating either key. Implementations must return a nonvar key deterministically and must not instantiate state variables.restart_state(+BestState, -RestartState)- supplies a diversified restart state between cycles. Without this hook, the best state and its cached energy are reused. The hook must return a nonvar state deterministically without instantiating the best state. Its energy is recomputed once; a better restart immediately updates the global best, while ties preserve the incumbent. Restart construction does not increment move statistics.tabu_tenure(+Step, +BestEnergy, +CurrentEnergy, -Tenure)- returns a non-negative integer tenure deterministically for each accepted move, using the zero-based global selection step and pre-move energies. It overrides ranged and fixed options without consuming a ranged-tenure random draw. Zero skips insertion while preserving earlier active entries. Expiration steps already assigned to entries never change.aspiration(+CandidateState, +CandidateEnergy, +BestEnergy)- optionally permits an otherwise tabu contender. Success permits the move; failure rejects it even when it improves the global best. Non-tabu candidates are admissible without this call. The original state, not its key, is passed. Implementations must not instantiate the candidate and should be pure: candidates unable to win selection do not trigger the hook.
For example, a structured state can use only its identifier as a key:
tabu_key(state(Identifier, _Payload), key(Identifier)).
Keys must remain stable throughout a run. Shared input variables retain
their identity; fresh variables do not produce stable equivalence across
calls. Energy evaluation and returned best solutions always use the
original states. An implemented hook that fails raises
domain_error(tabu_hook_result, tabu_key/2); an unbound result raises
domain_error(tabu_hook_result, tabu_key/2-Key). Exceptions thrown by
any problem hook propagate unchanged. Availability of the four policy
hooks is discovered once per run, including inherited and category
implementations; changing it during a run is not supported. These
input-preservation rules also apply to restart_state/2 and
aspiration/3. Failure or an unbound restart raises the corresponding
domain_error(tabu_hook_result, restart_state/2) or
domain_error(tabu_hook_result, restart_state/2-RestartState). The
same contract applies to tabu_tenure/4: failure reports its
indicator, and an invalid result reports tabu_tenure/4-Tenure in the
domain error.
Options
Options for the run/3-4 predicates:
max_steps(N)- maximum number of iterations per cycle (default:10000).tabu_tenure(T)- fixed tabu tenure: lifetime in steps of each tabu entry (default:7). Ignored whentabu_tenure_range/2or atabu_tenure/4implementation is present.tabu_tenure_range(Min, Max)- random tabu tenure: on each accepted move a tenure is drawn uniformly from the inclusive integer rangeMin..Max. Overridestabu_tenure/1when present, but is ignored when the problem implementstabu_tenure/4.candidates(N)- number of candidate neighbors examined per iteration (default:20).exhaustive(Boolean)- evaluate all enumerated neighbors in source order whentrue(default:false). Requires an implementedneighbors/2; its failure is an error. The candidate limit is ignored but still validated.updates(N)- number of progress reports during the run. Progress is reported by callingprogress/5on the problem object. Set to0to disable (default:0).seed(S)- positive integer seed for the random number generator, enabling reproducible runs (default: none).restarts(N)- number of additional tabu-search cycles after the first. Each restart clears the tabu list and usesrestart_state/2when defined, otherwise starting from the best state found so far (default:0).
Run statistics
The run/4 predicate returns a list of statistics about the completed
run:
steps(N)- total number of steps executed.acceptances(A)- number of accepted moves.improvements(I)- number of moves that strictly improved the best energy found. Better restart states update the best but do not increment this move counter.final_tabu_size(S)- size of the tabu list at termination.
Performance
For an enumerated neighborhood of size M and candidate limit
C < M, sampling uses one list pass and shuffles only the selected
subset. When at most 20 positions need to be included or excluded,
uniform random positions are drawn first; other cases use sequential
selection with inclusion probability equal to the number still needed
divided by the number remaining. Expected sampling work is
O(M + C log C), with O(C) auxiliary storage. When the full
neighborhood fits the limit, its order is preserved.
Candidates unable to improve an already selected candidate do not incur tabu-membership scans. Candidates improving the global best satisfy default aspiration without a scan. Custom aspiration first checks membership and is called only for tabu contenders. Other candidates compare against active keys, so large state terms and long tenures can increase membership costs.
The optional tabu_key/2 hook can reduce stored-term size and
membership comparison costs. It is called only for insertion or
membership checks that are needed; full states remain available for
energy evaluation and results. Exhaustive mode bypasses subset selection
but still materializes and evaluates the full list. Long custom tenures
may retain more entries than a later short tenure; entries expire
independently rather than by a fixed capacity.
Usage
Example of a problem definition
Define an object implementing the tabu_search_problem_protocol
protocol. For example, a simple quadratic minimization problem:
:- object(quadratic,
implements(tabu_search_problem_protocol)).
initial_state(50.0).
neighbor_state(X, Y) :-
fast_random(xoshiro128pp)::random(-5.0, 5.0, Delta),
Y is X + Delta.
state_energy(X, E) :-
E is (X - 3.0) * (X - 3.0).
:- end_object.
Running the algorithm
| ?- tabu_search(quadratic)::run(State, Energy).
State = 3.00..., Energy = 0.000...
Running with custom options
| ?- tabu_search(quadratic)::run(State, Energy, [max_steps(5000), tabu_tenure(10), candidates(30)]).
State = 3.00..., Energy = 0.000...
Random tabu tenure
| ?- tabu_search(quadratic)::run(State, Energy, [tabu_tenure_range(5, 12), max_steps(5000)]).
State = 3.00..., Energy = 0.000...
Exhaustive neighborhoods
For a problem implementing neighbors/2, evaluate all neighbors:
| ?- tabu_search(Problem)::run(State, Energy, [exhaustive(true)]).
Missing enumeration raises
existence_error(procedure, Problem::neighbors/2) before state
initialization. An implemented enumeration predicate that fails raises
domain_error(tabu_hook_result, neighbors/2); its exceptions
propagate. The full list is materialized, so exhaustive mode can be
costly for large neighborhoods.
Problem-controlled tenure
A problem can vary tenure according to the global selection step:
tabu_tenure(Step, _BestEnergy, _CurrentEnergy, Tenure) :-
Tenure is 3 + Step mod 5.
Running with statistics
| ?- tabu_search(quadratic)::run(State, Energy, Stats, []).
State = 3.00..., Energy = 0.000...,
Stats = [steps(10000), acceptances(...), improvements(...), final_tabu_size(...)]
Reproducible runs with seed
| ?- tabu_search(quadratic)::run(S1, E1, [seed(42)]),
tabu_search(quadratic)::run(S2, E2, [seed(42)]).
S1 = S2, E1 = E2.
Restarts
Run 3 tabu-search cycles (1 initial + 2 restarts). Each restart clears the tabu list and begins from the best state found so far:
| ?- tabu_search(quadratic)::run(State, Energy, [restarts(2)]).
State = 3.00..., Energy = 0.000...
Restart diversification
A problem can diversify each restart, for example by perturbing a numeric best state:
restart_state(Best, State) :-
State is Best + 5.
The original best remains available even when the perturbation worsens energy. Stopping and progress reporting see the recomputed restart energy before any move in the next cycle.
Custom aspiration
A problem can permit tabu moves whose energy does not exceed the global best:
aspiration(_CandidateState, CandidateEnergy, BestEnergy) :-
CandidateEnergy =< BestEnergy.
This replaces the default strict-improvement criterion. Failure rejects a tabu contender rather than falling back to that default.
Using a custom random number generator
Use the two-parameter version to select a specific fast_random
algorithm:
| ?- tabu_search(quadratic, well512a)::run(State, Energy).
State = 3.00..., Energy = 0.000...
| ?- tabu_search(quadratic, xoshiro256ss)::run(State, Energy, [seed(42)]).
State = 3.00..., Energy = 0.000...
Limitations
Solution-based tabu memory only - the tabu list stores states or their problem-defined
tabu_key/2keys rather than move attributes. Compact keys reduce memory use and identify equivalent solutions, but solution-based memory can still be large for richly structured states and is often less effective than attribute-based tabu for problems where the relevant forbidden features are local (e.g. edges in TSP, variable assignments in scheduling).No built-in reactive controller -
tabu_tenure/4supports problem-controlled adaptive schedules, but automatic cycle detection and reactive-tenure histories are not provided by the library.No built-in aspiration strategy catalog - classic best-so-far is the default rule. Other strategies can be supplied by
aspiration/3, but the library does not provide additional strategy implementations.Neighborhood exploration - when the problem does not define
neighbors/2, the algorithm samples a fixed number of candidates via repeated calls toneighbor_state/2orneighbor_state/3. Exhaustive mode evaluates a problem-provided list, but streaming enumeration of large neighborhoods is not supported.Short-term memory only - there is no intermediate-term or long-term memory (frequency-based or elite-set structures) and therefore no built-in intensification. Diversification can be supplied by
restart_state/2; the defaultrestarts(N)mechanism clears the tabu list and resumes from the best state found so far without built-in perturbations.Key identity - tabu membership is decided by strict term identity (
==/2) of states or optionaltabu_key/2keys, without instantiating either. Non-ground states are allowed; distinct variables are not identical. States that are semantically equivalent but not term-identical (e.g. rotations or reflections of a tour) are treated as distinct unless the problem normalizes them or supplies canonical keys.Single trajectory - the search follows one solution path at a time; population-based or multi-threaded variants are not currently implemented.
References
The following references describe the tabu-search framework, including short-term memory, tabu tenure, candidate selection, and aspiration criteria used by this library. They also discuss more advanced strategies beyond the implemented solution-based short-term memory approach.
Glover, F. (1989). “Tabu Search - Part I.” ORSA Journal on Computing, 1(3), 190-206. doi:10.1287/ijoc.1.3.190.
Glover, F. (1990). “Tabu Search - Part II.” ORSA Journal on Computing, 2(1), 4-32. doi:10.1287/ijoc.2.1.4.
Glover, F., and Laguna, M. (1997). Tabu Search. Springer US. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6089-0.